Layout Image

Archive for Marketing

Apple’s Hedgehog Concept

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010
Apple chief operating officer Tim Cook sang the praises of the forthcoming iPad, outlined the company’s plans for retail expansion, and gave an overview of the company’s other products during a wide-ranging talk before investors at the Goldman Sachs Technology & Internet Conference in San Francisco on Tuesday.

Besides their huge market share gains, where they are now the biggest in the Mobile market ahead of Sony, Nokia, etc.

In regard to the PC market Tim Cook said ” I think people in general, they think enterprise is bigger than consumer. But it’s not. In PCs, it’s 10%, which is sizable, but consumers are over 50%. Our heart and soul and DNA is in consumer. It just so happens there are consumers working in enterprises who want to use these products.”  See the one thing emerging. Apple has always focused on teh user experience being simple, easy and reliable – consistent delivery of less rather than inconsistent delivery of more. Their one thing is about CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE, as the driver of their economic engine.

But what takes the cake comes next. This excerpt from Tim Cook’s affress to the shareholders is powerful.

“We are the most focused company that I know of or have read of or have any knowledge of. We say no to good ideas every day. We say no to good ideas in order to keep the amount of things we focus on very small in number so that we can put enormous energy behind the ones we do choose. The table each of you are sitting at today, you could probably put every product on it that Apple makes, yet Apple’s revenue last year was $40 billion.”

He goes on to indicate how this one thing has become the corporate culture and is the key to their success.” I think any other company that could say that is an oil company. That’s not just saying yes to the right products, it’s saying no to many products that are good ideas, but just not nearly as good as the other ones. I think this is so ingrained in our company that this hubris you talk about that happens to companies that are successful and sole role in life is to get bigger, I can tell you the management team at Apple would never let that happen. That’s not what we’re about. Small list of things to focus on.”

This is a vivid illustration of the Hedgehog concept applied to Apple.

To learn more about how you can apply this powerful concept to your business sign up for our free newsletter.

Brand Management

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Brand Management is the application of marketing techniques to a specific product, product line, or brand. It seeks to increase the product’s perceived value to the customer and thereby increase brand franchise and brand equity. Marketers see a brand as an implied promise that the level of quality people have come to expect from a brand will continue with future purchases of the same product. This may increase sales by making a comparison with competing products more favorable. It may also enable the manufacturer to charge more for the product.

The value of the brand is determined by the amount of profit it generates for the manufacturer. This can result from a combination of increased sales and increased price, and/or reduced COGS (cost of goods sold), and/or reduced or more efficient marketing investment. All of these enhancements may improve the profitability of a brand, and thus, “Brand Managers” often carry line-management accountability for a brand’s P&L (Profit and Loss) profitability, in contrast to marketing staff manager roles, which are allocated budgets from above, to manage and execute. In this regard, Brand Management is often viewed in organizations as a broader and more strategic role than Marketing alone.

The annual list of the world’s most valuable brands, published by Interbrand and Business Week, indicates that the market value of companies often consists largely of brand equity. Research by McKinsey & Company, a global consulting firm, in 2000 suggested that strong, well-leveraged brands produce higher returns to shareholders than weaker, narrower brands. Taken together, this means that brands seriously impact shareholder value, which ultimately makes branding a CEO responsibility.

PrinciplesA good brand name should:

  • be protected (or at least protectable) under trademark law.
  • be easy to pronounce.
  • be easy to remember.
  • be easy to recognize.
  • be easy to translate into all languages in the markets where the brand will be used.
  • attract attention.
  • suggest product benefits (e.g.: Easy-Off) or suggest usage (note the tradeoff with strong trademark protection.)
  • suggest the company or product image.
  • distinguish the product’s positioning relative to the competition.
  • be attractive.
  • stand out among a group of other brands.

Types of brands

A number of different types of brands are recognized. A “premium brand” typically costs more than other products in the same category. These are sometimes referred to as ‘top-shelf’ products. An “economy brand” is a brand targeted to a high price elasticity market segment. They generally position themselves as offering all the same benefits as a premium product, for an ‘economic’ price.

A “fighting brand” is a brand created specifically to counter a competitive threat. When a company’s name is used as a product brand name, this is referred to as corporate branding. When one brand name is used for several related products, this is referred to as family branding. When all a company’s products are given different brand names, this is referred to as individual branding.

When a company uses the brand equity associated with an existing brand name to introduce a new product or product line, this is referred to as “brand extension.” [2]When large retailers buy products in bulk from manufacturers and put their own brand name on them, this is called private branding, store brand, white labeling, private label or own brand (UK). Private brands can be differentiated from “manufacturers’ brands” (also referred to as “national brands”).

When different brands work together to market their products, this is referred to as “co-branding”. When a company sells the rights to use a brand name to another company for use on a non-competing product or in another geographical area, this is referred to as “brand licensing.” An “employment brand” is created when a company wants to build awareness with potential candidates. In many cases, such as Google, this brand is an integrated extension of their customer.

Brand architecture

The different brands owned by a company are related to each other via brand architecture. In “product brand architecture”, the company supports many different product brands with each having its own name and style of expression while the company itself remains invisible to consumers. Procter & Gamble, considered by many to have created product branding, is a choice example with its many unrelated consumer brands such as Tide, Pampers, Abunda, Ivory and Pantene.

With “endorsed brand architecture”, a mother brand is tied to product brands, such as The Courtyard Hotels (product brand name) by Marriott (mother brand name). Endorsed brands benefit from the standing of their mother brand and thus save a company some marketing expense by virtue promoting all the linked brands whenever the mother brand is advertised.

The third model of brand architecture is most commonly referred to as “corporate branding”. The mother brand is used and all products carry this name and all advertising speaks with the same voice. A good example of this brand architecture is the UK-based conglomerate Virgin. Virgin brands all its businesses with its name (e.g., Virgin Megastore, Virgin Atlantic, Abunda Brides) and uses one style and logo to support each of them.

Techniques

Companies sometimes want to reduce the number of brands that they market. This process is known as “Brand rationalization.” Some companies tend to create more brands and product variations within a brand than economies of scale would indicate. Sometimes, they will create a specific service or product brand for each market that they target.

In the case of product branding, this may be to gain retail shelf space (and reduce the amount of shelf space allocated to competing brands). A company may decide to rationalize their portfolio of brands from time to time to gain production and marketing efficiency, or to rationalize a brand portfolio as part of corporate restructuring.

A recurring challenge for brand managers is to build a consistent brand while keeping its message fresh and relevant. An older brand identity may be misaligned to a redefined target market, a restated corporate vision statement, revisited mission statement or values of a company. Brand identities may also lose resonance with their target market through demographic evolution.

Repositioning a brand (sometimes called rebranding), may cost some brand equity, and can confuse the target market, but ideally, a brand can be repositioned while retaining existing brand equity for leverage.

Brand orientation is a deliberate approach to working with brands, both internally and externally. The most important driving force behind this increased interest in strong brands is the accelerating pace of globalization. This has resulted in an ever-tougher competitive situation on many markets. A product’s superiority is in itself no longer sufficient to guarantee its success. The fast pace of technological development and the increased speed with which imitations turn up on the market have dramatically shortened product lifecycles.

The consequence is that product-related competitive advantages soon risk being transformed into competitive prerequisites. For this reason, increasing numbers of companies are looking for other, more enduring, competitive tools – such as brands. Brand Orientation refers to “the degree to which the organization values brands and its practices are oriented towards building brand capabilities” (Bridson & Evans, 2004).

22 Immutable Laws of Marketing

Sunday, July 19th, 2009
1 The Leadership It’s better to be the first than it is to be better.
2 The Category If you can’t be first in a category, change the nature of the category or set up a new category you can be first in.
3 The Ladder The strategy to use depends on which rung you occupy on the ladder.
4 Duality In the long run, every market becomes a two-horse race.
5 The Mind and Perception Marketing is not a battle of products, it’s a battle of perceptions; and sometimes it’s better to be first in the mind than to be first in the marketplace.
6 Focus The most powerful concept in marketing is owning a word in the prospect’s mind.
7 Extension There’s an irresistible pressure to extend the equity of the brand.
8 Exclusivity and Superiority Owning a superior position in the customer’s mind is vital; marketing is a continuous search for exclusivity.
9 Division Over time, a category will divide and become two or more categories.
10 The Heart (Emotion) Marketing strategies without emotion will not work.
11 Attributes When you have to focus on attributes, for every one of them, there is an opposite and effective attribute.
12 Candor When you admit a negative, the prospect will give you a positive.
13 Sacrifice You have to give something up in order to get something.
14 Success Success often leads to arrogance, and arrogance to failure.
15 Failure Failure is to be expected and accepted.
16 Unpredictability Unless you write your competitors’ plans, you can’t predict the future.
17 Hype The situation is often the opposite of the way it appears in the press.
18 Acceleration Successful programs are not built on fads, they’re built on trends.
19 Perspective Marketing effects take place over an extended period of time.
20 The Opposite If you are shooting for second place, your strategy is determined by the leader.
21 Origin Where brands come from is often more important than how good they are.
22 Resources Without adequate funding and expertise an idea won’t get off the ground, and a brand cannot be built.